WikiIndex talk:Naming conventions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(PLEASE COMMENT) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
** [[AnUnnamedMoinMoinWiki]] is a problematic name. See also: http://dunck.us/collab/FrontPage | ** [[AnUnnamedMoinMoinWiki]] is a problematic name. See also: http://dunck.us/collab/FrontPage | ||
*** We could use the url instead. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:44, 30 Jan 2006 (EST) | *** We could use the url instead. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:44, 30 Jan 2006 (EST) | ||
*** I agree, and in my humble opinion, some wiki's are not worth having in the system and can be deleted. Of course we have to be a bit careful because sometimes an active wiki is offline for a short period of time, but there are a lot of wiki's that were no more than short lived experiments which are junking up our wiki. --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 14:37, 30 Jan 2006 (EST) |
Revision as of 19:37, 30 January 2006
Choosing a name
- What if the home link has one name and a different name appears in the welcome message?
- Personally I think we should link to the home link, but it may be a judgement call, SpookyWiki seemed pretty straight forward to me. That text could change anytime, but the FrontPage is always the same, unless there is a code change. MarkDilley
- What if there is no name?
- AnUnnamedMoinMoinWiki is a problematic name. See also: http://dunck.us/collab/FrontPage
- We could use the url instead. TedErnst | talk 11:44, 30 Jan 2006 (EST)
- I agree, and in my humble opinion, some wiki's are not worth having in the system and can be deleted. Of course we have to be a bit careful because sometimes an active wiki is offline for a short period of time, but there are a lot of wiki's that were no more than short lived experiments which are junking up our wiki. --Raymond King | talk 14:37, 30 Jan 2006 (EST)
- AnUnnamedMoinMoinWiki is a problematic name. See also: http://dunck.us/collab/FrontPage