Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
→Lengthy criticisms
(→Lengthy criticisms: actually, it's the longest by far) |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
I dislike CP as well, but Wikiindex seems to be, well, an index: a very short description of the wikis, some technical details, some links. CP is unique in that it has a ''whole entire wiki'' dedicated to criticizing it and drawing attention to its worst abuses and most comical moments. Isn't that sort of thing beyond the scope of this site? [[User:74.7.166.234|74.7.166.234]] 14:42, 13 November 2008 (EST) | I dislike CP as well, but Wikiindex seems to be, well, an index: a very short description of the wikis, some technical details, some links. CP is unique in that it has a ''whole entire wiki'' dedicated to criticizing it and drawing attention to its worst abuses and most comical moments. Isn't that sort of thing beyond the scope of this site? [[User:74.7.166.234|74.7.166.234]] 14:42, 13 November 2008 (EST) | ||
: Looking at [[Special:Longpages]], it basically has the longest description of any wiki. ([[Uncyclopedia]] has more bytes, but has a 325 word description compared to Conservapedia's 1661 words; [[Transontologia]] is an unwikified cut-n-paste) --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 15:21, 13 November 2008 (EST) | : Looking at [[Special:Longpages]], it basically has the longest description of any wiki. ([[Uncyclopedia]] has more bytes, but has a 325 word description compared to Conservapedia's 1661 words; [[Transontologia]] is an unwikified cut-n-paste) --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 15:21, 13 November 2008 (EST) | ||
::I think it's important to note who edits the page to figure out why the criticism section is so long. [[User: Proxima Centauri]] is an active contributer to RationalWiki, as are [[User:Gulik]] and [[User:Barbara Shack]]. [[User:74.215.185.102|74.215.185.102]] 15:29, 13 November 2008 (EST) | |||