41
edits
Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
→Lengthy criticisms
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
: Looking at [[Special:Longpages]], it basically has the longest description of any wiki. ([[Uncyclopedia]] has more bytes, but has a 325 word description compared to Conservapedia's 1661 words; [[Transontologia]] is an unwikified cut-n-paste) --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 15:21, 13 November 2008 (EST) | : Looking at [[Special:Longpages]], it basically has the longest description of any wiki. ([[Uncyclopedia]] has more bytes, but has a 325 word description compared to Conservapedia's 1661 words; [[Transontologia]] is an unwikified cut-n-paste) --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 15:21, 13 November 2008 (EST) | ||
::I think it's important to note who edits the page to figure out why the criticism section is so long. [[User: Proxima Centauri]] is an active contributer to RationalWiki, as are [[User:Gulik]] and [[User:Barbara Shack]]. [[User:74.215.185.102|74.215.185.102]] 15:29, 13 November 2008 (EST) | ::I think it's important to note who edits the page to figure out why the criticism section is so long. [[User: Proxima Centauri]] is an active contributer to RationalWiki, as are [[User:Gulik]] and [[User:Barbara Shack]]. [[User:74.215.185.102|74.215.185.102]] 15:29, 13 November 2008 (EST) | ||
:::Well, I think it's borderline ridiculous. Link to CP, link to the RW entry on this Index, let the rest speak for itself. I think there is especially no need for ''specific incidents'' to be reported, in detail, on an indexing site. [[User:Fishal|Fishal]] 01:19, 14 November 2008 (EST) | |||