User talk:Speckmade: Difference between revisions
(Overcategorization) |
(→Wiki License parameter: Wiki License categories) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Hi Speckmade. I reverted your changes to the {{tl|Wiki}} template. For some reason, it was breaking the infobox in some articles, but not in others. I left a note about it on the talk page of the template. I like the idea, though. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 18:40, 14 October 2008 (EDT) | Hi Speckmade. I reverted your changes to the {{tl|Wiki}} template. For some reason, it was breaking the infobox in some articles, but not in others. I left a note about it on the talk page of the template. I like the idea, though. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 18:40, 14 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
:I added a note about removing the "Wiki" from the license name in the Wiki License category notes. That was the primary reason why I edited the boilerplate template. It seemed a little counter-intuitive that the category name did not match the text you have to put in the infobox (I was confused by it intially), so I wanted to try to help other people by spelling it out. Hopefully, the note will serve that purpose. However, if you have a better way of doing it, please do. Thanks, [[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 16:03, 4 December 2008 (EST) | |||
== Overcategorization == | == Overcategorization == | ||
Hi Speckmade. Thanks for creating all of those categories! However, it seems to me that we ought to consolidate some of them. For example, do we really need the three categories [[:Category:Blog|blog]], [[:Category:Blogs|blogs]], and [[:Category:Blogging|blogging]]? What's the difference between them? --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 14:50, 4 December 2008 (EST) | Hi Speckmade. Thanks for creating all of those categories! However, it seems to me that we ought to consolidate some of them. For example, do we really need the three categories [[:Category:Blog|blog]], [[:Category:Blogs|blogs]], and [[:Category:Blogging|blogging]]? What's the difference between them? --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 14:50, 4 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:03, 4 December 2008
Hello and welcome back to WikiIndex! Looks like you know your way around the place. Great! Let me know if you have any ideas or questions about this wiki. Best, MarkDilley
- Nice to hear some words from real humans...
- Thanks for the offer - I'll remember it!--Speckmade 17:12, 23 May 2007 (EDT)
Welcome to WikiIndex. I see you've made many good edits already. I hope you enjoy contributing to and exploring the WikiIndex. (I agree that OneBuckWiki doesn't look like a wiki.) --DavidCary 01:49, 22 November 2007 (EST)
Question about OneBuckWiki (and similar websites) at Category talk:Wiki Edit Mode#PayToEdit.3F --EarthFurst 16:40, 17 December 2007 (EST)
Curious
I like the tags and am wondering why you are removing all of them?
- I do not simply remove all of them.
- Those tags are there to categorise pages - and if a page is already categorised more precisely in a subcategory I remove them from the main category. I think it's more clear and logical this way.
- (Curious: Does this make sense to you?)--Speckmade 09:53, 19 July 2008 (EDT)
Wiki License parameter
Hi Speckmade. I reverted your changes to the Template:Tl template. For some reason, it was breaking the infobox in some articles, but not in others. I left a note about it on the talk page of the template. I like the idea, though. --MarvelZuvembie 18:40, 14 October 2008 (EDT)
- I added a note about removing the "Wiki" from the license name in the Wiki License category notes. That was the primary reason why I edited the boilerplate template. It seemed a little counter-intuitive that the category name did not match the text you have to put in the infobox (I was confused by it intially), so I wanted to try to help other people by spelling it out. Hopefully, the note will serve that purpose. However, if you have a better way of doing it, please do. Thanks, MarvelZuvembie 16:03, 4 December 2008 (EST)
Overcategorization
Hi Speckmade. Thanks for creating all of those categories! However, it seems to me that we ought to consolidate some of them. For example, do we really need the three categories blog, blogs, and blogging? What's the difference between them? --MarvelZuvembie 14:50, 4 December 2008 (EST)