Talk:TheBestLinks.com: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Unknown guy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Sean Fennel (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The [http://www.thebestlinks.com/Special__3A__Statistics.html statistics] on this wiki are incredibly messed up. --[[User:Elassint|Elassint]] 18:48, 2 January 2009 (EST) | The [http://www.thebestlinks.com/Special__3A__Statistics.html statistics] on this wiki are incredibly messed up. --[[User:Elassint|Elassint]] 18:48, 2 January 2009 (EST) | ||
:Considering the few edits and the fact that the main page has only 50.000 views, and the rest mostly under 1000, I think it's fake. But I just submitted the number they claim on the font page... --[[User:Unknown guy|Unknown guy]] 20:46, 2 January 2009 (EST) | :Considering the few edits and the fact that the main page has only 50.000 views, and the rest mostly under 1000, I think it's fake. But I just submitted the number they claim on the font page... --[[User:Unknown guy|Unknown guy]] 20:46, 2 January 2009 (EST) | ||
::It appears to have been seeded from a Wikipedia database dump. It's most noticeable in the help pages and edit histories. — <span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Comic Sans MS;">[[User:Sean Fennel]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|@]]</span> 21:36, 3 January 2009 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 02:36, 4 January 2009
The statistics on this wiki are incredibly messed up. --Elassint 18:48, 2 January 2009 (EST)
- Considering the few edits and the fact that the main page has only 50.000 views, and the rest mostly under 1000, I think it's fake. But I just submitted the number they claim on the font page... --Unknown guy 20:46, 2 January 2009 (EST)
- It appears to have been seeded from a Wikipedia database dump. It's most noticeable in the help pages and edit histories. — User:Sean Fennel@ 21:36, 3 January 2009 (EST)