User talk:Michaeldsuarez: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Welcome. I'd like to say thanks for restoring the Conservapedia article. This fight is unusual for Wikiindex which is usually a quiet wiki. Tbhis just shows how much religious fundies love Conservapedia and how much others hate it. I'm an admin but I can help only a little. I promised that I wouldn't use admin buttons over Conservapedia. Thanks for dealing with [[ScribbleWiki]] as well. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 11:36, 19 November 2008 (EST) | Welcome. I'd like to say thanks for restoring the Conservapedia article. This fight is unusual for Wikiindex which is usually a quiet wiki. Tbhis just shows how much religious fundies love Conservapedia and how much others hate it. I'm an admin but I can help only a little. I promised that I wouldn't use admin buttons over Conservapedia. Thanks for dealing with [[ScribbleWiki]] as well. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 11:36, 19 November 2008 (EST) | ||
:Wow. That statement proves why Proxima should not be editing the article on Conservapedia. Are there any other admins on this site? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 14:29, 19 November 2008 (EST) | :Wow. That statement proves why Proxima should not be editing the article on Conservapedia. Are there any other admins on this site? [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 14:29, 19 November 2008 (EST) | ||
::I'm a bit sorry for Jazzman. He worked hard to protect Conservaspedia and here's how TK rewarded him. ''[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:HelpJazz HelpJazz] was blocked for this though TK who blocked him aspires to be a [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=User:TK&oldid=110566 bureaucrat at RationalWiki]''. TK has the support of site owner [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Andrew_Schlafly Andrew Schlafly]. Those who know the problems on Conervapedia shouldn't be editing the article? Really? [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 05:41, 16 February 2009 (EST) | |||
== ComplaintWiki == | == ComplaintWiki == | ||
[[ComplaintWiki]] is down. It's been internittently offline. It's back for now. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 09:38, 29 January 2009 (EST) | [[ComplaintWiki]] is down. It's been internittently offline. It's back for now. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 09:38, 29 January 2009 (EST) | ||
==Thanks== | |||
Thanks for helping with vandalism to the Main Page. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 05:41, 16 February 2009 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 10:41, 16 February 2009
Welcome. I'd like to say thanks for restoring the Conservapedia article. This fight is unusual for Wikiindex which is usually a quiet wiki. Tbhis just shows how much religious fundies love Conservapedia and how much others hate it. I'm an admin but I can help only a little. I promised that I wouldn't use admin buttons over Conservapedia. Thanks for dealing with ScribbleWiki as well. Proxima Centauri 11:36, 19 November 2008 (EST)
- Wow. That statement proves why Proxima should not be editing the article on Conservapedia. Are there any other admins on this site? JazzMan 14:29, 19 November 2008 (EST)
- I'm a bit sorry for Jazzman. He worked hard to protect Conservaspedia and here's how TK rewarded him. HelpJazz was blocked for this though TK who blocked him aspires to be a bureaucrat at RationalWiki. TK has the support of site owner Andrew Schlafly. Those who know the problems on Conervapedia shouldn't be editing the article? Really? Proxima Centauri 05:41, 16 February 2009 (EST)
ComplaintWiki
ComplaintWiki is down. It's been internittently offline. It's back for now. Proxima Centauri 09:38, 29 January 2009 (EST)
Thanks
Thanks for helping with vandalism to the Main Page. Proxima Centauri 05:41, 16 February 2009 (EST)