User talk:GetSmartFan44: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(New page: Conservapedia has been the subject of arguments. There seems to be a compromise that users need information about how to avoid getting blocked there. Seeing a ban window unexpectedly...)
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Conservapedia]] has been the subject of arguments.  There seems to be a compromise that users need information about how to avoid getting blocked there.  Seeing a ban window unexpectedly can be a shock and Wikiindex wants to warn potential Conservapedia users about that risk. I'm not talking about intentional vandals.  They know what to expect.  If you read the section that I restored you will see that users can get blocked and do get blocked for doing things that would be allowed or even considered constructive on other wikis. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 07:34, 25 February 2009 (EST)
[[Conservapedia]] has been the subject of arguments.  There seems to be a compromise that users need information about how to avoid getting blocked there.  Seeing a ban window unexpectedly can be a shock and Wikiindex wants to warn potential Conservapedia users about that risk. I'm not talking about intentional vandals.  They know what to expect.  If you read the section that I restored you will see that users can get blocked and do get blocked for doing things that would be allowed or even considered constructive on other wikis. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 07:34, 25 February 2009 (EST)
That's why I don't like Conservapedia, but that section seemed like it was intended to scare possible users away from that wiki. It was also poorly written.--[[User:GetSmartFan44|GetSmartFan44]] 09:53, 25 February 2009 (EST)