Template talk:Size: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(parameters without underscores)
(wikiFactor)
Line 25: Line 25:


Thanks to [[User:Speckmade|Speckmade]] who got it running with one edit[http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Template%3ASize&diff=61298&oldid=45258] . Greetings! [[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 06:28, 21 December 2008 (EST)
Thanks to [[User:Speckmade|Speckmade]] who got it running with one edit[http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Template%3ASize&diff=61298&oldid=45258] . Greetings! [[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 06:28, 21 December 2008 (EST)
== wikiFactor ==
Hello folks, trying to leave a comment in the correct place - I would like the wikiFactor above the number of pages, both for aesthetics and because it is cool!  Please point me to any discussion of this.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]

Revision as of 05:35, 27 March 2009

To help, see Project Wikis By Size

See also: Category:Wiki Size.

formatting

I just reverted an anon change to put this table on the right. Maybe that's appropriate, if it's right underneath our main wiki template, but the way I'm visioning this right now, it'll be at the very bottom of the page, and centered. Of course this can change. Please discuss when changing again. Thanks! TedErnst

All comments on formatting welcome, including placement on the page. Should it be right-justified under the Wiki template? or centered like now? TedErnst | talk 19:28, 10 Mar 2006 (EST)

Since it overlaps the main template box on small screens when centered, I moved it to the left today. TedErnst | talk 17:23, 13 Mar 2006 (EST)

Why not use the same formatting as template:wiki, with the size template designed to go below the wiki template on the right side of the page? User:BlankVerse | talk 23:09, 29 Mar 2006 (EST)

User:Smiddle/sizeTest

Could some skilled person please apply this template somehow into this? I tried but it didn't work. – Smiddle/TC@ 15:46, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

Do you like it raw?

When providing a link to a wiki's statistics, is the raw count preferred, or the more user-friendly version? Obviously, it's up to the editor's discretion, but is there any advantage to providing the raw statistics without the accompanying explanations? --MarvelZuvembie 16:16, 6 October 2008 (EDT)

Raw is good for MediaWikis in rarely spoken languages i.e. Chinese, because raw is in "SimpleEnglish". --Wolf | talk 06:25, 21 December 2008 (EST)

parameters without underscores

Thanks to Speckmade who got it running with one edit[1] . Greetings! Wolf | talk 06:28, 21 December 2008 (EST)

wikiFactor

Hello folks, trying to leave a comment in the correct place - I would like the wikiFactor above the number of pages, both for aesthetics and because it is cool! Please point me to any discussion of this. Best, MarkDilley