1,136
edits
Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
::::I suppose the beef may have been updated, but I'm just pointing out that that particular beef appeared to be due to an ambiguous statement. <del>This might be one of those "inaccuracies", if there is more than one.</del> [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:37, 30 August 2009 (EDT) This might be one of Proxima's "inaccuracies" that I keep reading about, if there is more than one. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:54, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ::::I suppose the beef may have been updated, but I'm just pointing out that that particular beef appeared to be due to an ambiguous statement. <del>This might be one of those "inaccuracies", if there is more than one.</del> [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:37, 30 August 2009 (EDT) This might be one of Proxima's "inaccuracies" that I keep reading about, if there is more than one. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:54, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::OK. I realise that the statement is somewhat ambiguous, but there were other flaws. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 12:41, 30 August 2009 (EDT) | :::::OK. I realise that the statement is somewhat ambiguous, but there were other flaws. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 12:41, 30 August 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I will attempt to write [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/Ambiguous_abstractions_hypothesis with less ambiguity] in the future. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 02:59, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
== Similar wikis == | == Similar wikis == |
edits