User talk:Huw Powell: Difference between revisions
(→Censoring dissenting opinion: sorry, found that you had indeed posted a sort of "rebuttal") |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Censoring dissenting opinion == | == Censoring dissenting opinion == | ||
Hello again, I'm writing in reference to your recent edit of the [[RationalWiki]] article, wherein you removed the link to the following argument. "[[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|Wikipedia achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki better than RationalWiki does]]". Your edit summary was, "11:08, 1 September 2009 [...] (Lumenos, please whine on the talk page.)" Did you read the argument? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 10:04, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | Hello again, I'm writing in reference to your recent edit of the [[RationalWiki]] article, wherein you removed the link to the following argument. "[[Talk:RationalWiki#Criticism_and_rebuttals|Wikipedia achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki better than RationalWiki does]]". Your edit summary was, "11:08, 1 September 2009 [...] (Lumenos, please whine on the talk page.)" <del>Did you read the argument? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 10:04, 1 September 2009 (EDT)</del> | ||
:I'm sorry, I found that you had in fact replied, but due to the location (and the general disorganization of talk pages) I neglected to notice it until now. I have answered your rebuttal and I will give you some time to formulate a response (if you should wish to do so) before adding the critical comment back to the article or perhaps to another article entitled [[Criticism of RationalWiki]], in keeping with [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#How_sympathetic_or_critical.3F_.28Who_decides.3F.29|what little consensus we have garnered thus far]]. If you have any other disagreement with the argument your input would be appreciated. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:02, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
If you have any disagreement with the argument your input would be appreciated. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] | |||
Secondly, if you have any suggestions for why [[WikiIndex]] should not allow certain criticisms, or how to objectively judge which ones should or should not be allowed, your reasoning on this matter would be appreciated in [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#How_sympathetic_or_critical.3F_.28Who_decides.3F.29|this section of the policy page]]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 10:03, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | Secondly, if you have any suggestions for why [[WikiIndex]] should not allow certain criticisms, or how to objectively judge which ones should or should not be allowed, your reasoning on this matter would be appreciated in [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#How_sympathetic_or_critical.3F_.28Who_decides.3F.29|this section of the policy page]]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 10:03, 1 September 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 15:02, 1 September 2009
Hello,
Huw Powell,
I(we) have thousands of things to do. I think your are aware that WikiIndex has no cyber judge function (at present). Would you be so kind as to give CP and other readers time to overthink your point of view. With the hope that my english is understandable. Regards --Wolf | talk 03:33, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
- I think you mean PC, not CP? Your English is far better than my German. Far, far better. And thank you for the welcome! Huw Powell 06:12, 12 July 2009 (EDT)
Censoring dissenting opinion
Hello again, I'm writing in reference to your recent edit of the RationalWiki article, wherein you removed the link to the following argument. "Wikipedia achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki better than RationalWiki does". Your edit summary was, "11:08, 1 September 2009 [...] (Lumenos, please whine on the talk page.)" Did you read the argument? Lumenos 10:04, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
- I'm sorry, I found that you had in fact replied, but due to the location (and the general disorganization of talk pages) I neglected to notice it until now. I have answered your rebuttal and I will give you some time to formulate a response (if you should wish to do so) before adding the critical comment back to the article or perhaps to another article entitled Criticism of RationalWiki, in keeping with what little consensus we have garnered thus far. If you have any other disagreement with the argument your input would be appreciated. Lumenos 11:02, 1 September 2009 (EDT)
Secondly, if you have any suggestions for why WikiIndex should not allow certain criticisms, or how to objectively judge which ones should or should not be allowed, your reasoning on this matter would be appreciated in this section of the policy page. Lumenos 10:03, 1 September 2009 (EDT)