1,136
edits
User talk:Lumenos: Difference between revisions
→Reordering talk page comments
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Reordering talk page comments == | == Reordering talk page comments == | ||
You have just made [[Talk:RationalWiki]] impossible to follow. Please stop doing that. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:06, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | You have just made [[Talk:RationalWiki]] impossible to follow. Please stop doing that. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 03:06, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:You could reorder it. I thank you for helping by posting that message showing that I had moved something that seemed off-topic, in my view. My ideal is something I call a [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/Wikiforum wikiforum]. Isn't there are way we can create debate maps, and remove dated or otherwise irrelevant information? I suggested a separate article for criticism and Proxima stated that she would prefer this to the "no criticism" approach. Are you open to the idea of someone linking or posting any criticism that you may not agree with? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 06:00, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | :'''''[For others who are reading this, I believe Nx is referring to the dialog beginning with the [[Talk:RationalWiki#Similar_wikis|Similar Wikis "debate map"]] that I and Nx created on that talk page (although he is presently acting as though he was unaware of this) and subsequent "mass quoting" to which Nx expressed no objections that I remember. Bob also is acting as if he is aware of this, thus prompting me to create this clarification notice. ;-) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:03, 3 September 2009 (EDT)]''''' You could reorder it. I thank you for helping by posting that message showing that I had moved something that seemed off-topic, in my view. My ideal is something I call a [http://lumeniki.referata.com/wiki/Wikiforum wikiforum]. Isn't there are way we can create debate maps, and remove dated or otherwise irrelevant information? I suggested a separate article for criticism and Proxima stated that she would prefer this to the "no criticism" approach. Are you open to the idea of someone linking or posting any criticism that you may not agree with? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 06:00, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Er, Lumenos, you could also not screw up talk pages in the first place. "Reordering it" would probably consist of reverting to before you mucked it up. Nice work of applying your rather unique mental processes to a shared space. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 07:17, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ::Er, Lumenos, you could also not screw up talk pages in the first place. "Reordering it" would probably consist of reverting to before you mucked it up. Nice work of applying your rather unique mental processes to a shared space. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 07:17, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Well I wish I'd have known how you both feel about this, before I went to all that effort. I suppose you could revert it, but Nx did much work on it since the first reordering. He was certainly aware of it long before he complained, as the edit history shows. I made it into a "debate map". Did you feel that it was misleading, biased, or hard to read? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:47, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | :::Well I wish I'd have known how you both feel about this, before I went to all that effort. I suppose you could revert it, but Nx did much work on it since the first reordering. He was certainly aware of it long before he complained, as the edit history shows. I made it into a "debate map". Did you feel that it was misleading, biased, or hard to read? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 07:47, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
:::::::''Lumenos:Well people might say something before posting to a section that states that this is its intended purpose.'' | :::::::''Lumenos:Well people might say something before posting to a section that states that this is its intended purpose.'' | ||
:::::::Not quite sure that I understand you there. Anyway, I say something before almost all of my edits - but usually the only one listening is my dog, and she usually has no comment. --[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 11:22, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::::Not quite sure that I understand you there. Anyway, I say something before almost all of my edits - but usually the only one listening is my dog, and she usually has no comment. --[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 11:22, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::::Thank you for signing single paragraphs. This isn't too confusing if I reply here even though there is a post after it, right? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:03, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
::::::::If you scroll up and read the first phrase in bold, you might figure out what I thought we were talking about here. To me this is like a subtopic of all the topics that are less indented. What would be conventional from my sense of order, is if you are not aware of the "topic" you undent to the point at which you are following the discussing, then comment there. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:03, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::::::On debate mapping. Without putting too fine a point on this - perhaps your use of bold in conversations is already sufficiently ...errrrr ... dramatic.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 11:25, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::::On debate mapping. Without putting too fine a point on this - perhaps your use of bold in conversations is already sufficiently ...errrrr ... dramatic.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 11:25, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Writing policies and facilitating consensus == | == Writing policies and facilitating consensus == | ||