1,136
edits
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
::::::::Thank you for signing single paragraphs. This isn't too confusing if I reply here even though there is a post after it, right? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:03, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::::::Thank you for signing single paragraphs. This isn't too confusing if I reply here even though there is a post after it, right? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:03, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::::If you scroll up and read the first phrase in bold, you might figure out what I thought we were talking about here. To me this is like a subtopic of all the topics that are less indented. What would be conventional from my sense of order, is if you are not aware of the "topic" you undent to the point at which you are following the discussing, then comment there. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:03, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::::::If you scroll up and read the first phrase in bold, you might figure out what I thought we were talking about here. To me this is like a subtopic of all the topics that are less indented. What would be conventional from my sense of order, is if you are not aware of the "topic" you undent to the point at which you are following the discussing, then comment there. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:03, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::I put a clarification notice in the first of "my" posts, on the top of this section. I didn't alter any of your posts in any way. Please let me know if I have failed to satisfy reason, once again. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:07, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::::::On debate mapping. Without putting too fine a point on this - perhaps your use of bold in conversations is already sufficiently ...errrrr ... dramatic.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 11:25, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::::On debate mapping. Without putting too fine a point on this - perhaps your use of bold in conversations is already sufficiently ...errrrr ... dramatic.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 11:25, 3 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
edits