User talk:Huw Powell: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (revert, my bad)
Line 18: Line 18:


''The following is a quote from Huw Powell taken from [[WikiIndex_talk:Policies_and_Guidelines|this location]]:'' "I think the general policy here is to simply ''describe'' wikis, not to engage in petty arguments about their worldview. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 07:14, 1 September 2009 (EDT)"
''The following is a quote from Huw Powell taken from [[WikiIndex_talk:Policies_and_Guidelines|this location]]:'' "I think the general policy here is to simply ''describe'' wikis, not to engage in petty arguments about their worldview. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 07:14, 1 September 2009 (EDT)"
:Oh. And have you have been merely attempting to defend your "pet" wiki from these petty arguments, or are you completely uninvolved in these supposed debates "about [wikis] worldview[s]"? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:21, 3 September 2009 (EDT)
:Oh. And have you been merely attempting to defend your "pet" wiki from these petty arguments, or are you completely uninvolved in these supposed debates "about [wikis] worldview[s]"? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 05:47, 3 September 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:23, 3 September 2009

Hello,

Huw Powell,

I(we) have thousands of things to do. I think your are aware that WikiIndex has no cyber judge function (at present). Would you be so kind as to give CP and other readers time to overthink your point of view. With the hope that my english is understandable. Regards --Wolf | talk 03:33, 10 July 2009 (EDT)

I think you mean PC, not CP? Your English is far better than my German. Far, far better. And thank you for the welcome! Huw Powell 06:12, 12 July 2009 (EDT)

Censoring dissenting opinion

Hello again, I'm writing in reference to your recent edit of the RationalWiki article, wherein you removed the link to the following argument. "Wikipedia achieves the stated goals of RationalWiki better than RationalWiki does". Your edit summary was, "11:08, 1 September 2009 [...] (Lumenos, please whine on the talk page.)" Did you read the argument? Lumenos 10:04, 1 September 2009 (EDT)

I'm sorry, I found that you had in fact replied, but due to the location (and the general disorganization of talk pages) I neglected to notice it until now. I have answered your rebuttal and I will give you some time to formulate a response (if you should wish to do so) before possibly adding the comment back. Consensus on this matter is tied. Lumenos 15:38, 1 September 2009 (EDT)

Secondly, if you have any suggestions for why WikiIndex should not allow certain criticisms, or how to objectively judge which ones should or should not be allowed, your reasoning on this matter would be appreciated in this section of the policy page. Lumenos 10:03, 1 September 2009 (EDT)

My "agenda"

The following is a quote from Huw Powell taken from this location: "Lumenos seems to have one agenda here, and that is fairly clear when one looks at L's contribs." Huw Powell 07:14, 1 September 2009 (EDT)

Hum now you went from "seems to have" to "fairly clear", but you don't feel any need to describe the this agenda? I'd be interested in hearing what you perceive that to be. Is it comedy? Direct action? I've no idea what you are referring to. Lumenos 05:47, 3 September 2009 (EDT)

The following is a quote from Huw Powell taken from this location: "I think the general policy here is to simply describe wikis, not to engage in petty arguments about their worldview. Huw Powell 07:14, 1 September 2009 (EDT)"

Oh. And have you been merely attempting to defend your "pet" wiki from these petty arguments, or are you completely uninvolved in these supposed debates "about [wikis] worldview[s]"? Lumenos 05:47, 3 September 2009 (EDT)