1,136
edits
User talk:Phantom Hoover: Difference between revisions
→Please don't reignite the edit war: Oh rally, Hooves?
(→Please don't reignite the edit war: Oh rally, Hooves?) |
|||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
:Sorry. I keep reverting him because he ceased to participate in discussion and just added the controversial sections back in, with wording that implied that he was winning the debate all along. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 11:37, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | :Sorry. I keep reverting him because he ceased to participate in discussion and just added the controversial sections back in, with wording that implied that he was winning the debate all along. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 11:37, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::So he's adding it all right back, you're reverting it again, he re-adds, you re-revert... can you see where this is going? In any event, I've invited him to a serious discussion and I'd like to extend that invitation to you. Three-way meeting on the RationalWiki talk page? [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 12:17, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | ::So he's adding it all right back, you're reverting it again, he re-adds, you re-revert... can you see where this is going? In any event, I've invited him to a serious discussion and I'd like to extend that invitation to you. Three-way meeting on the RationalWiki talk page? [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 12:17, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::I didn't actually add the criticism back. I pointed to the fact that this debate existed on the talk page. I've already wrote the following explanation but I will meet you there. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:53, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
::An anonymous editor [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWiki&diff=71909&oldid=71828 claimed that they had proven a number of things]. Without deleting this, I posted the '''fact''' that I had cited Wikipedia policy and given an example to make my case, and that none of this was done by the opposition, in their "rebuttals". This apparently was too "controversial" as well, so [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWiki&diff=71935&oldid=71909 Phantom Hooover reverted to the version with all their unsubstantiated claims]. Now he has deleted the criticism for maybe the 8th time, on the grounds that [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWiki&diff=71952&oldid=71948 I hadn't responded to Huw], when [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Talk%3ARationalWiki&diff=71950&oldid=71805 in fact I had, at that time]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:53, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
::There are a many here who are sympathetic to RationalWiki, but not many who are sympathetic to WikiIndex having critical reviews. If I make up for this imbalance, then I am accused of domination. It becomes a lot of work when editors like Phantom Hoover and Huw Powel, are allowed to delete things and require others to rewrite them, when they put little effort into editing or real debate. Bob M is much more reasonable and Nx was at least as reasonable as I am. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:53, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | |||