616
edits
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
Maybe I'm wrong, but it looks to me like that's what you're trying to do. If you think Lumenos' contributions to the website are SO bad, surely you could explain why? Sorry, but words such as "biased idiocy" aren't enough of an explanation. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 11:06, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | Maybe I'm wrong, but it looks to me like that's what you're trying to do. If you think Lumenos' contributions to the website are SO bad, surely you could explain why? Sorry, but words such as "biased idiocy" aren't enough of an explanation. [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 11:06, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Sorry. I keep reverting him because he ceased to participate in discussion and just added the controversial sections back in, with wording that implied that he was winning the debate all along. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 11:37, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | :Sorry. I keep reverting him because he ceased to participate in discussion and just added the controversial sections back in, with wording that implied that he was winning the debate all along. [[User:Phantom Hoover|Phantom Hoover]] 11:37, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::So he's adding it all right back, you're reverting it again, he re-adds, you re-revert... can you see where this is going? In any event, I've invited him to a serious discussion and I'd like to extend that invitation to you. Three-way meeting on the RationalWiki talk page? [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 12:17, 24 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
edits