User talk:Comets: Difference between revisions
(request to unprotect wiki articles) |
(Hi Comets,) |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
[[Talk:Liberapedia#Vote_for_re-insertion]] | [[Talk:Liberapedia#Vote_for_re-insertion]] | ||
== Hi Comets, == | |||
I recreated ;-) the page [[Christopedia]] in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and <code>{{Template|add}}</code>. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 08:45, 11 November 2009
Who's Online?
Users Online: <whosonline></whosonline>
- Articles = 22,027
- Pages = 37,702
- Users = 12,944
- Admins = 16
- Files = 4,788
- Current User = 192.168.144.2
Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let John Stanton know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, MarkDilley
- Np :) ..--Comets 06:30, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
Request for neutral admin
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!
We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of Conservapedia, RationalWiki, and The Conservapedia RationalWiki war. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website.
Thanks, JazzMan 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)
block length
Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this WikiIndex a better place.
I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at WikiIndex:Blocking Policy ? --DavidCary 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
Dispute resolution
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is here ~~ MarkDilley
About that "dispute resolution"...
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 sysops to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):
Talk:RationalWiki#Vote_for_re-insertion
Talk:A_Storehouse_of_Knowledge#Vote_for_re-insertion
Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote_for_re-insertion
Talk:Liberapedia#Vote_for_re-insertion
Hi Comets,
I recreated ;-) the page Christopedia in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and {{add}}. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --Wolf | talk 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST)