User talk:TeraS

Template:RightTOC Hello and a belated Welcome to WikiIndex. Best, MarkDilley

<huggles>

Thank you for the welcome!

TeraS

Incubus

I've actually seen Incubus (which is much easier to obtain now thanks to Netflix). Even though it's Shatner, his cadence isn't nearly as annoying in Esperanto as it is in English. --MarvelZuvembie 19:50, 18 May 2009 (EDT)

It's actually one of the movies on my Wiki but there are other much better movies out there on succubi or incubi...

TeraS

I know it's not your mainstay, but I started following your Tumblr. Shhh... don't tell anyone. --MarvelZuvembie 14:59, 12 October 2011 (PDT)

Hugs! Thank you MZ and I returned the favour! TeraS 15:11, 12 October 2011 (PDT)

Your thoughts on upgrade and logo

Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - WikiIndex:Admin_Notes#October_2010_Upgrade_Thoughts - best, MarkDilley

Blocking Spammers

No worries! We fight side by side against spammers :-) Raymond King | talk

Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all

Please check out WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision and WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path, Best, MarkDilley

grrrr

n00b grrrrrrrrr .....--Comets 04:59, 27 April 2011 (PDT)

Tera - I think you are doing great, despite this unconstructive message. Mistakes are part of life :-) Best, MarkDilley

This was the only wiki where i was not mistakenly blocked by a n00b admin ....well uptil now :(..--Comets 15:58, 27 April 2011 (PDT)

Thanks!

Thanks for cleaning up my talk page. I wonder what that was all about. --MarvelZuvembie 13:14, 18 August 2011 (PDT)

Welcome! TeraS 16:19, 18 August 2011 (PDT)

Also, thanks for catching the spammers! --MarvelZuvembie 16:07, 6 September 2011 (PDT)

I was amazed at just how many there were this morning... yeesh!! TeraS 16:17, 6 September 2011 (PDT)

Thank you for reverting tons of spam and blocking spammers. I see you have been blocking spammers "with an expiry time of infinite". Would you mind joining the discussion on the appropriate length of time for the first few blocks at WikiIndex talk: Blocking Policy? I currently think that it would be better overall to use much shorter blocks, at least for the first offense or two, but perhaps you have a very good reason for infinite blocks. (I discuss some reasons for shorter blocks on that talk page and at User talk:Proxima Centauri#User:Jonah Musto). With your help, I hope that someday we will have a good blocking policy that not only clearly states what the policy is, but also explains why. --DavidCary 08:53, 25 September 2011 (PDT)

Always happy to help David... I commented as asked, but in short I do not see why blatant spammers deserve a second chance ever. TeraS 10:22, 25 September 2011 (PDT)

IP addresses can shift to different owners, but in the case of known domains from spambot blacklists, I say block them indefinitely. --MarvelZuvembie 14:49, 26 September 2011 (PDT)

I agree, but really when they return from the same IP anonymously over and over again I don't see the problem with banning them. But I'll go an extra step in their case and see what fSpamlist says about them before the hammer comes out... TeraS 16:02, 26 September 2011 (PDT)

Tera, you rock! I never thought I would say this, but it's good to have a succubus watching out for me! ;-) --MarvelZuvembie 12:23, 19 October 2011 (PDT)

appreciate the spam fighting

will try to get captcha enabled soon. Best, MarkDilley

Falls over after another Spam Attack

I think I need a splint on my fingers after that! TeraS 09:53, 18 October 2011 (PDT)

talk:Collaborative

Hope you will post an opinion to Category talk:Collaborative. --EarthFurst 12:19, 11 December 2011 (PST)

Looks like math captcha is failing for account creation

is that your assessment?

Well, the amount of spammers I think has been reduced a lot since that was added. Account creation I think is less of a problem than anon IP editing of pages to add spam, but that's just my opinion. TeraS 12:15, 29 December 2011 (PST)

a pointer for you to delete and block

Hi, I see you have been deleting some of User:ScottSchaefer and Scott Schaefer and his contributions. I raised concern on another Admins (DavidCary) talk page here - maybe you'd like to add your $0.02/€0.02/£0.02 worth! Best regards Hoof Hearted 15:29, 30 December 2011 (PST)

Hi HH... Personally I couldn't see a reason for any of the pages to exist here and after poking at some of the links I saw nothing that made me want to keep any of it... TeraS 15:49, 30 December 2011 (PST)

Maybe, just maybe - LexingtonWiki is worth keeping - because it does seem to be a wiki in the true spirit - albeit an unethical one - but I'll tidy it up and strip out any remaining URLs. Maybe protect it now it shows it for what it is - ie a host for spammers!

BTW, would you mind reading my comment here - Template talk:Refresh? Best -- Hoof Hearted 16:02, 30 December 2011 (PST)