User talk:Comets: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
({{TOCright}}, tidy (rv whitespace, fix spelling etc), wikilinks, wiki-markup (rather than HTML))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TOCright}}
==Who's Online? ==
==Who's Online? ==
<b>Users Online</b>: <whosonline></whosonline>
'''Users Online''': <whosonline></whosonline>
 
*Articles = {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}
* Articles = {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}
*Pages = {{NUMBEROFPAGES}}
* Pages = {{NUMBEROFPAGES}}
*Users = {{NUMBEROFUSERS}}
* Users = {{NUMBEROFUSERS}}
*Admins = {{NUMBEROFADMINS}}
* Admins = {{NUMBEROFADMINS}}
*Files = {{NUMBEROFFILES}}
* Files = {{NUMBEROFFILES}}
*Current User = {{CURRENTUSER}}
* Current User = {{CURRENTUSER}}


Hello and thanks for the tip!  I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-)  Glad you are here.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
Hello and thanks for the tip!  I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-)  Glad you are here.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
:Np :) ..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 06:30, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
:Np :) ..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 06:30, 26 March 2008 (EDT)


== Request for neutral admin ==
==Request for neutral admin==
 
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!


We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki]], and [[ The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]]. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website.
We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki]], and The Conservapedia RationalWiki war. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)
 
Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)


== block length ==
==block length==
 
Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this [[WikiIndex]] a better place. I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at [[WikiIndex:Blocking Policy]] ? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
Dear Comets,
thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this WikiIndex a better place.
 
I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at [[WikiIndex:Blocking Policy]] ?
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
 
== Dispute resolution ==


==Dispute resolution==
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThis_is_not_the_solution&diff=69572&oldid=69536 here] ~~ [[MarkDilley]]
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThis_is_not_the_solution&diff=69572&oldid=69536 here] ~~ [[MarkDilley]]


== About that "dispute resolution"... ==
==About that "dispute resolution"...==
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):


Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 sysops to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):
[[Talk:RationalWiki#Vote for re-insertion]]


[[Talk:RationalWiki#Vote_for_re-insertion]]
[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]]


[[Talk:A_Storehouse_of_Knowledge#Vote_for_re-insertion]]
[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]]


[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote_for_re-insertion]]
[[Talk:Liberapedia#Vote for re-insertion]]
 
[[Talk:Liberapedia#Vote_for_re-insertion]]
 
== Hi Comets, ==


==Hi Comets,==
I recreated ;-) the page [[Christopedia]] in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and <code>{{Template|add}}</code>. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST)
I recreated ;-) the page [[Christopedia]] in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and <code>{{Template|add}}</code>. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST)
:oh OK, its better than what was previously :P ..haha :)..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 21:31, 11 November 2009 (EST)


oh OK, its better than what was previously :P ..haha :)..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 21:31, 11 November 2009 (EST)
==Your thoughts on upgrade and logo==
 
Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - [[WikiIndex:Admin Notes#October 2010 Upgrade Thoughts]] - best, [[MarkDilley]]
== Your thoughts on upgrade and logo ==
 
Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - [[WikiIndex:Admin_Notes#October_2010_Upgrade_Thoughts]] - best, [[MarkDilley]]
 
== Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all ==


==Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all==
Please check out [[WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]], Best, [[MarkDilley]]
Please check out [[WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]], Best, [[MarkDilley]]


== Yes I'm all thumbs ==
==Yes I'm all thumbs==
 
I think I'll just stop for a while to be honest. Sorry again [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] 07:30, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
I think I'll just stop for a while to be honest. Sorry again [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] 07:30, 27 April 2011 (PDT)


== Why so rough? ==
==Why so rough?==
 
It was less than a minute. Just checking in.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
It was less than a minute. Just checking in.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]

Revision as of 12:13, 1 January 2012

Template:TOCright

Who's Online?

Users Online: <whosonline></whosonline>

  • Articles = 22,027
  • Pages = 37,702
  • Users = 12,944
  • Admins = 16
  • Files = 4,788
  • Current User = 192.168.144.2

Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let John Stanton know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, MarkDilley

Np :) ..--Comets 06:30, 26 March 2008 (EDT)

Request for neutral admin

Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!

We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of Conservapedia, RationalWiki, and The Conservapedia RationalWiki war. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, JazzMan 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)

block length

Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this WikiIndex a better place. I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at WikiIndex:Blocking Policy ? --DavidCary 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT)

Dispute resolution

Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is here ~~ MarkDilley

About that "dispute resolution"...

Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 sysops to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):

Talk:RationalWiki#Vote for re-insertion

Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion

Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion

Talk:Liberapedia#Vote for re-insertion

Hi Comets,

I recreated ;-) the page Christopedia in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and {{add}}. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --Wolf | talk 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST)

oh OK, its better than what was previously :P ..haha :)..--Comets 21:31, 11 November 2009 (EST)

Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - WikiIndex:Admin Notes#October 2010 Upgrade Thoughts - best, MarkDilley

Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all

Please check out WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision and WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path, Best, MarkDilley

Yes I'm all thumbs

I think I'll just stop for a while to be honest. Sorry again TeraS 07:30, 27 April 2011 (PDT)

Why so rough?

It was less than a minute. Just checking in. Best, MarkDilley

Retrieved from "https://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Comets&oldid=91021"