Category talk:Wiki status: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m ({{TOCright}}, tweaks) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (reply) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Hi, are ~1000 unique visitor per day enough to be vibrant? Please corrct my entry, if not: [[AtmWiki]] --[[User:84.137.212.109|84.137.212.109]] 04:05, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | Hi, are ~1000 unique visitor per day enough to be vibrant? Please corrct my entry, if not: [[AtmWiki]] --[[User:84.137.212.109|84.137.212.109]] 04:05, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | ||
:This category really refers to the 'editing' status, not page views. 'Recent changes' is the easiest place to look, rgds, --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 03:31, 10 January 2012 (PST) | |||
== dead vs inactive == | == dead vs inactive == |
Revision as of 11:31, 10 January 2012
Definitions
Are there definitions for these Status messages I can use in deciding which to choose? TedErnst 01:18, 19 Jan 2006 (EST)
- Definitions have been added.
Hi, are ~1000 unique visitor per day enough to be vibrant? Please corrct my entry, if not: AtmWiki --84.137.212.109 04:05, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT)
- This category really refers to the 'editing' status, not page views. 'Recent changes' is the easiest place to look, rgds, --Hoof Hearted 03:31, 10 January 2012 (PST)
dead vs inactive
I see there is a Category:Inactive with a related Template:Inactive, and a Category:Dead with a related Template:Wiki dead.
Is there any useful difference between "inactive" status vs "dead" status? --DavidCary 09:30, 7 July 2009 (EDT)
- It seems to be no difference between inactive and dead. I'd suggest to merge "inactive" into "dead". An edit on the wiki template could do this automatically. --Wolf | talk 09:36, 7 July 2009 (EDT)
- MarkDilley prefers using Template:Inactive because it removes the listing from every category except "Inactive". (He says so on the Template:Wiki dead page.) --MarvelZuvembie 14:28, 28 October 2009 (EDT)
merged?
Animation Wiki ( animation.wikia.com ) is merging into cartoons.wikia.com. What Wiki Status would that be? (GoalReached ?) --EarthFurst 04:59, 25 October 2009 (EDT)
- GoalReached makes sense to me. I think I used that for a similar situation, along with an internal link to the merged site's entry. --MarvelZuvembie 14:25, 28 October 2009 (EDT)