Conservapedia
| [{{{URL}}} {{{logo}}}] | [{{{URL}}} Conservapedia] [{{{recentchanges URL}}} Recent changes] [No WikiNode] [No About] [No Mobile URL] |
|---|---|
| Founded by: | |
| Status: | [[:Category:{{{status}}}|{{{status}}}]] |
| Language: | [[:Category:Wiki {{{language}}}|{{{language}}}]] |
| Edit mode: | [[:Category:{{{editmode}}}|{{{editmode}}}]] |
| Wiki engine: | [[:Category:{{{engine}}}|{{{engine}}}]] |
| Wiki license: | [[:Category:Wiki {{{license}}}|{{{license}}}]] |
| Main topic: | [[:Category:{{{maintopic}}}|{{{maintopic}}}]] |
Conservapedia is an encyclopedia written with a conservative viewpoint; specifically, Conservapedia's articles are politically conservative, friendly to young Earth creationism and conservative Christianity, and USA-centric. Conservapedia is in general hostile to liberals, homosexuals, and people who support or teach the theory of evolution.
The site was started in November 2006 by Andrew Schlafly and a group of homeschooled people to provide an alternative to the perceived anti-Christian, pro-Evolution, anti-American and anti-conservative bias of Wikipedia. The stated purpose of the site is to provide a family-friendly resource for homeschooled children from fundamentalist Christian homes. However, a few more adult topics such as homosexuality are also treated in depth.
Conservapedia cannot be edited during nighttime, U.S. time, except by users with special "night editing" rights, to prevent vandals from striking when all or most of the administrators are asleep.
Statistics
| Wiki size: | unknown size |
As of 20 December 2008, Conservapedia had 26,529 registered users, of which 30 (or 0.11%) are Administrators.
Suggested guidelines for prospective editors
Some WikiIndex editors have had negative experiences with this wiki and offer the following precautions in order to prevent having your account blocked:
- As it says on Conservapedia's user creation page, "User names based on your real name or initials are preferred" [1], but are not required. While some users with names like HertyA and Lainy74 are blocked and told to create a new name, other users with names like "HelpJazz", "Bugler", and "Foxtrot", (all users who later gained blocking rights) were not.
- Conservapedia's "90/10 rule" states that "unproductive activity, such as 90% talk page edits and only 10% quality edits to Conservapedia articles, may result in blocking of the account". New users are often surprised to find out that these numbers are not strictly followed, and can sometimes be blocked before making 10 total edits, especially if their edits are argumentative or questioning of the wiki. It is best to first establish yourself by making constructive edits to articles before trying to delve into the more controversial subjects.
- Be wary of disagreeing with a sysop. They may block you for disagreeing, though this may be unlikely if you are following all the other rules (including 90/10).
- Be wary of an abundant use of {{fact}} tags on articles, especially if you could add the citations yourself. This practice is often viewed as "ideologically-motivated tagging", and is frowned upon on Conservapedia.
- Conservapedia is a conservative, creationist encyclopedia. As such, it is best not to post anything that might be construed as "liberally biased" or "pro-evolution". Even if you feel pro evolution arguments are flawed saying so can lead to a block.
- Do not write rude or offensive material about another user, especially don't disparage a sysop. Do not imitate users in high standing who can be very critical. Ordinary users do not have the same freedom.
- If you get blocked for any of these reasons and you think the block was unfair, do not create a new account. Instead, email the administrator or user who blocked you and appeal for a second chance. Most users are granted leniency and are allowed to edit again. This applies especially to those who did not know they did anything wrong since many get blocked without realizing they did anything wrong.
- If the sysop who blocked you does not have email enabled, you can appeal to another sysop. This is against their new policy, but the worst they can do is block you for all eternity.
- If Aschafly accuses you of being a Liberal, don't bother denying it, as that's just Liberal Denial, Liberal Deceit, a Liberal Falsehood, Liberal Hypocrisy, and Liberal Obfuscation. All you can do at that point is confess your sins and plead for mercy, and Andy may condescend to allow you stay, as long as you never post anything else he disagrees with.
- Don't post using the same name on any liberal sites. ESPECIALLY not RationalWiki. That's a banning offense, despite the fact they claim not to do that (#15).
See also
- RationalWiki, an entire wiki originally founded to criticize Conservapedia, now also criticizes pseudo-science in general.
- Liberapedia, the parody wiki of Conservapedia