Talk:Encyclopedia Dramatica
Update
I find I can't update some of the elements of this page because encyclopediadramatica.com appears in the Wikimedia spam blacklist. The Edit Mode is currently LoginToEdit, and the site currently contains 5,577 articles. In addition, the URL to the image is currently broken (the logo is at /images/wiki.png instead of /skins/common/images/wiki.png). Any assistance fixing this would be great. It is incredibly unlikely that Wikimedia would remove the URL from their spam blacklist, but if there is a whitelist here, that could troubleshoot this problem. --Blu Aardvark 05:39, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
- There is. I'll see what I can do. I have to go shout at someone. Nathan 05:41, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
- I found the same problem, please have a look on it --Wolf | talk 17:22, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
- Everyone's going to find the same problem until it's actually fixed, it's not just confined to one person. Nathan 17:37, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
- sorry, I only wanted to force the solution, --Wolf | talk 17:42, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
- Well, obviously you failed, since it's more than a year later and still not fixed. :-) GreenReaper 13:23, 24 October 2008 (EDT)
- sorry, I only wanted to force the solution, --Wolf | talk 17:42, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
- Everyone's going to find the same problem until it's actually fixed, it's not just confined to one person. Nathan 17:37, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
- fixed, tell me if something else needs fixing...--Comets 23:51, 6 November 2008 (EST)
- I found the same problem, please have a look on it --Wolf | talk 17:22, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
I've whitelisted it. Should be no more problems editing this page now. — User:Sean Fennel@ 18:15, 10 December 2008 (EST)
- Well adding that site to the whitelist may not be a good idea since links to that site is used in page move vandalism across the wikiworld..might be a good idea to temp whitelist it or it ma become a nuisance..--Comets 20:11, 10 December 2008 (EST)
Free speech
The site is dedicated to "lutz". This is a kind of schadenfreude usually set in a humorous context. Due to this, I believe, there is certain information allowed there, which is forbidden in places where "politeness" is enforced. Lumenos 19:57, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
- I agree with this concept, although we have to keep in mind that lulz takes precidence over truth and verifiability so while there may be information on certain subjects, information on other subjects may not be as quality as subjects other wikis do address. Tyciol 01:50, 21 November 2009 (EST)