390
edits
User talk:Abd: Difference between revisions
→What RONR has to say about attacking a member's motives
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
::::Instead, I suspect, you are setting things up for another wiki-[[Wikipedia:Ragnarok|Ragnarok]].--[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 20:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | ::::Instead, I suspect, you are setting things up for another wiki-[[Wikipedia:Ragnarok|Ragnarok]].--[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 20:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::It's actually a trap they're on the verge of falling into. If they go on Meta and say "This guy created articles on WikiIndex as part of a vendetta against us" and get the rest of their cabal riled up about it, then I will have evidence that they assumed bad faith; and since that's a violation of wiki norms, they will all be banned from Meta, and the only people left on Meta will be those who are either neutral or supportive of me. Those good users will get me unblocked, because there will be no longer anyone around to oppose such an action. | :::::It's actually a trap they're on the verge of falling into. If they go on Meta and say "This guy created articles on WikiIndex as part of a vendetta against us" and get the rest of their cabal riled up about it, then I will have evidence that they assumed bad faith; and since that's a violation of wiki norms, they will all be banned from Meta, and the only people left on Meta will be those who are either neutral or supportive of me. Those good users will get me unblocked, because there will be no longer anyone around to oppose such an action. | ||
:::::With the bad users gone, Sanger's Law will cause the entire culture of the wiki to permanently change in revolutionary ways, becoming more tolerant and open to dissident viewpoints. It will begin to better fulfil its three stated purposes. All this has been planned out; I am several moves ahead of my opponents in my thinking and they can do nothing but the {{w|Glossary_of_chess#F|forced moves}} that have already been decreed. It's determinism in its most sublimely pure and beneficent form. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 21:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | :::::With the bad users gone, Sanger's Law will cause the entire culture of the wiki to permanently change in revolutionary ways, becoming more tolerant and open to dissident viewpoints. It will begin to better fulfil its three stated purposes. All this has been planned out; I am several moves ahead of my opponents in my thinking and they can do nothing but the {{w|Glossary_of_chess#F|forced moves}} that have already been decreed. It's determinism in its most sublimely pure and beneficent form. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 21:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::: I personally think, after reading this, that your presence at this wiki is a big joke at our and others expense. You seem to get a sort of delight at seeing Abd debate with you, while you have no real intention debating with him. You seemed to have sucked yourself unto this wiki and you are planning to suck it dry. Ever since I started adding wikis to wikiindex, I have noticed that you continiously change your wikipages, start debates on irrelevant issues and now you are creating biographies on users you may or may not be enemies with. In other words, you want people to notice you here and connect your presence to wikiindex. Why? Who cares. But the pattern is solid and that is all I care about. --[[User:Redgreenfourties|Redgreenfourties]] ([[User talk:Redgreenfourties|talk]]) 22:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | |||