1,756
edits
User talk:Abd: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→What RONR has to say about attacking a member's motives
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
::::You are arguing endlessly, and your arguments are corrupt. You actually know better, if you'll stop to think this all the way through. | ::::You are arguing endlessly, and your arguments are corrupt. You actually know better, if you'll stop to think this all the way through. | ||
::::Instead, I suspect, you are setting things up for another wiki-[[Wikipedia:Ragnarok|Ragnarok]].--[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 20:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | ::::Instead, I suspect, you are setting things up for another wiki-[[Wikipedia:Ragnarok|Ragnarok]].--[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 20:42, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::It's actually a trap they're on the verge of falling into. If they go on Meta and say "This guy created articles on WikiIndex as part of a vendetta against us" and get the rest of their cabal riled up about it, then I will have evidence that they assumed bad faith; and since that's a violation of wiki norms, they will all be banned from Meta, and the only people left on Meta will be those who are either neutral or supportive of me. Those good users will get me unblocked, because there will be no longer anyone around to oppose such an action. | |||
:::::With the bad users gone, Sanger's Law will cause the entire culture of the wiki to permanently change in revolutionary ways, becoming more tolerant and open to dissident viewpoints. It will begin to better fulfil its three stated purposes. All this has been planned out; I am several moves ahead of my opponents in my thinking and they can do nothing but the {{w|Glossary_of_chess#F|forced moves}} that have already been decreed. It's determinism in its most sublimely pure and beneficent form. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 21:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC) | |||