User talk:Leucosticte: Difference between revisions

→‎Banns: policy pages
(→‎Banns: policy pages)
Line 63: Line 63:


:I see that there are allegedly "extremely serious" reasons for your indef block. I just have [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/why-so-serious one question]. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 16:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
:I see that there are allegedly "extremely serious" reasons for your indef block. I just have [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/why-so-serious one question]. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 16:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
You dumped a more or less complete policy on the formerly nearly empty page [[WikiIndex:Blocking and banning policy]]. the discussion was, as usual ongoing and 'endless'. Nothing was decided. When Your text sticks on that policy page it looks like valid policy to most, which it is not. I think You should dump that on the associated talk page instead. I think is it quite inappropriate that any user dumps text which has not been decided about via discussion and decision finding on any policy page. Don't You recognize that policy pages are different from all other kind of pages in the way they get written and edited? Talk pages are also special in so far that one should not edit others talk on such pages (except for supportive formatting). Do You see the principal difference between talk pages, articles and policy pages? [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]])  22 September 2014 (UTC)
Anonymous user