1,756
edits
(→Banns: linkfix) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (→Banns: re) |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
Was there a reason given in You case? Had there been warning? [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] | Was there a reason given in You case? Had there been warning? [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] | ||
:It's a very convoluted situation, and at this point the proceedings have become pretty opaque. It is, after all, an ArbCom case, and not one of the formal, publicly-adjudicated litigations either, but the kind that they discuss on their private email list. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 16:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC) | :It's a very convoluted situation, and at this point the proceedings have become pretty opaque. It is, after all, an ArbCom case, and not one of the formal, publicly-adjudicated litigations either, but the kind that they discuss on their private email list. | ||
:I see that there are allegedly "extremely serious" reasons for your indef block. I just have [http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/why-so-serious one question]. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 16:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC) |
edits