User talk:Kghbln: Difference between revisions

User talk:Kghbln (edit)

392 bytes added , 17 November 2014

5,924

edits

Revision as of 18:58, 17 November 2014 (edit) Kghbln (talk \| contribs) (→‎Wikia: chg) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:22, 17 November 2014 (edit) (undo) Manorainjan (talk \| contribs) (→‎Wikia: ;-)) Newer edit →
Line 144:		Line 144:

	: Obviously and utterly wrong, since there is no such engine like Wikia. They use MediaWiki. I realised that this mistake is on every wiki using is. To bad, so I will revert myself. Thanks for the note. Cheers --[[User:Kghbln\|[[kgh]]]] ([[User talk:Kghbln\|talk]]) 18:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC)		: Obviously and utterly wrong, since there is no such engine like Wikia. They use MediaWiki. I realised that this mistake is on every wiki using is. To bad, so I will revert myself. Thanks for the note. Cheers --[[User:Kghbln\|[[kgh]]]] ([[User talk:Kghbln\|talk]]) 18:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

			I guess the combination of the MW-ngine being "heavily modified" and the large number of such wikis justifies the introduction of such "engine". The question would be, in how far a known engine needs to be modified to justify giving it its own name and also how we would get to know about that? [[User:Manorainjan\|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan\|talk]]) 20:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC)