5,924
edits
(→Wikia: chg) |
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→Wikia: ;-)) |
||
Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
: Obviously and utterly wrong, since there is no such engine like Wikia. They use MediaWiki. I realised that this mistake is on every wiki using is. To bad, so I will revert myself. Thanks for the note. Cheers --[[User:Kghbln|[[kgh]]]] ([[User talk:Kghbln|talk]]) 18:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC) | : Obviously and utterly wrong, since there is no such engine like Wikia. They use MediaWiki. I realised that this mistake is on every wiki using is. To bad, so I will revert myself. Thanks for the note. Cheers --[[User:Kghbln|[[kgh]]]] ([[User talk:Kghbln|talk]]) 18:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
I guess the combination of the MW-ngine being "heavily modified" and the large number of such wikis justifies the introduction of such "engine". The question would be, in how far a known engine needs to be modified to justify giving it its own name and also how we would get to know about that? [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 20:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC) |
edits