Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
User talk:Comets: Difference between revisions
Fix redirects, fix red links
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (Fix redirect following article rename) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win! | Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win! | ||
We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki]], and [[Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war|The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]]. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST) | We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki (en)]], and [[Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war|The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]]. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST) | ||
==block length== | ==block length== | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
==About that "dispute resolution"...== | ==About that "dispute resolution"...== | ||
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages): | Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages): | ||
*[[Talk:RationalWiki#Vote for re-insertion]] | *[[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Vote for re-insertion]] | ||
*[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]] | *[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]] | ||
*[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]] | *[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]] | ||