User talk:Comets: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Fix redirect following article rename)
(Fix redirects, fix red links)
 
Line 20: Line 20:
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!


We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki]], and [[Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war|The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]].  As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia.  As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia.  As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website.  Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)
We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki (en)]], and [[Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war|The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]].  As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia.  As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia.  As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website.  Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)


==block length==
==block length==
Line 30: Line 30:
==About that "dispute resolution"...==
==About that "dispute resolution"...==
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):
*[[Talk:RationalWiki#Vote for re-insertion]]
*[[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Vote for re-insertion]]
*[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]]
*[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]]
*[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]]
*[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]]

Navigation menu