6,456
edits
Category talk:WikiIndex: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(Added comment requesting a more explicit category name.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think simply "WikiIndex" is confusing... I'd personally make either that or "Wikis" the root node of the category that contains all wikis, and subcategories listing *kinds* of wikis... If this is a meta category I'd personally prefer it to have a name like "WikiIndex Itself" or just "Meta". The latter is shorter but I think the former would be more universally understood. - [[User:JenniferForUnity|JenniferForUnity]] 17:03, 16 October 2006 (EDT) | I think simply "WikiIndex" is confusing... I'd personally make either that or "Wikis" the root node of the category that contains all wikis, and subcategories listing *kinds* of wikis... If this is a meta category I'd personally prefer it to have a name like "WikiIndex Itself" or just "Meta". The latter is shorter but I think the former would be more universally understood. - [[User:JenniferForUnity|JenniferForUnity]] 17:03, 16 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
: Jennifer (may I call you Jennifer?), I love your energy for categorization! We've needed someone like you around here for a long time! :-) Browse is supposed to be our root, overall. We've never really had a clear idea what to do overall from there. Can you help us figure it out? I like your proposal for using the Meta namespace instead of WikiIndex. I also like your proposal of Wikis as the root of everything that's a wiki. Right now I suppose Wiki lists is that root for all wikis. I'm not really sure. Feel free to go for whatever change you think is uncontroversial and/or easy to do. And feel free to call for discussion on anything that'll take a lot of work. Thanks so much for being here! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 17:43, 16 October 2006 (EDT) | |||