284
edits
User talk:TedErnst: Difference between revisions
→WikiSize Categories: - More disucssion on size... added {{CatDis}} template.
(InterWiki) |
(→WikiSize Categories: - More disucssion on size... added {{CatDis}} template.) |
||
| Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
what do you think about refinement in sizes like 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 etc. ? It seems better to me to say that a wiki has more than 50 articles if it has 95 and rank it higher as wikis with about 11 articles. --[[User:Peu|Peu]] 16:38, 17 October 2006 (EDT) | what do you think about refinement in sizes like 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500 etc. ? It seems better to me to say that a wiki has more than 50 articles if it has 95 and rank it higher as wikis with about 11 articles. --[[User:Peu|Peu]] 16:38, 17 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
:I was going to put in sizes if there weren't any already. My initial thoughts was log powers of 10 (10, 100, 1000, 10000, etc as was done) and then I thought about it a bit more and figured it wouldn't have much resolution and maybe 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256... would be more elegant. In either case the bigger problem seems to me like it's a lack of buy in on the whole idea. People aren't searching in "size" really, they're mostly going to be searching by topic and then want "the biggest wiki" that's close to the topic they want. I'm not sure how to give them that info really... | |||
:Perhaps the wiki templace should have a "# of pages" tag? - [[User:JenniferForUnity|JenniferForUnity]] 12:20, 18 October 2006 (EDT) | |||
{{CategoryDiscussions}} | |||
== InterWiki == | == InterWiki == | ||