User talk:John Stanton: Difference between revisions

→‎qwepoksdf - what does this mean?: I block them in this way
(→‎qwepoksdf - what does this mean?: I block them in this way)
Line 348: Line 348:
: Spoke with some other wiki folks at Wiki Wednesday who are experiencing the same attack & nobody seem to know, it is annoying.  [[User:John Stanton|John]] 10:18, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
: Spoke with some other wiki folks at Wiki Wednesday who are experiencing the same attack & nobody seem to know, it is annoying.  [[User:John Stanton|John]] 10:18, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
: See my recent edit of [[Talk:WikiProject:Recent_Changes_Patrol]]. These are likely spammers testing the terrain before putting in real spam. I know it's against our policy, but may I suggest banning their IPs? It is al least moderately effective, which is better than nothing. -- [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 04:37, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
: See my recent edit of [[Talk:WikiProject:Recent_Changes_Patrol]]. These are likely spammers testing the terrain before putting in real spam. I know it's against our policy, but may I suggest banning their IPs? It is al least moderately effective, which is better than nothing. -- [[Felix Pleşoianu]] | <small>[[User talk:Felix|talk]]</small> 04:37, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
: I block them for a period that depends on activity. Long distances of junk insertion leads to long block times:
: * 1 junk edit &rarr; 1 day
: * 1 junk edits only today &rarr; 3 days
: * 1 junk edits since 1 month &rarr; 3 months
: I think it's a good idea - if they come back after unblocking, I can use the Block Log to find out how long they should be blocked.
But, do we do the right, are these IPs ony used by spamming bots?
4,624

edits