WikiIndex:Proposals: Difference between revisions

WikiIndex:Proposals (edit)

Revision as of 03:51, 20 February 2006

1,495 bytes added , 20 February 2006

no edit summary

Rathbone

Bureaucrats, interwiki, staff, Administrators

2,182

edits

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 :: I still don't understand.  How is this different from Meatball or Wikipedia? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:11, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
+== Proposal: 2006-02-17 ordering on this page ==
+I re-ordered this page to put newest at the bottom to encourge us to deal with the older ones first, and move them off this page.  Also, don't know if you know about this feature, but there is a + item next to the "edit" link at the top of talk pages.  That feature adds a new section, without having to edit the whole page.  Since that new section goes at the bottom, this re-organization allows that feature to be used on this page. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:10, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
+* I think that the page should be added to the top, not withstanding the section editing function. It is more friendly to read new proposals at the top. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small>
+** Mark, if this was moved to the archive in error, please move it back to the [[Proposals]] page so it can be further discussed.  I also invite you to go further in your reasoning as it's feeling like "because I said so" again.  [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 22:47, 19 Feb 2006 (EST)
+'''Yes''', and I propose that we make an area for the proposals we've moved off this list, perhaps "ProposalArchive" or something like that --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 18:40, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
+* ProposalArchive and [[Guidelines, agreed upon]] would be more specific to what happened to the ideas. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small>
 == Proposal: 2006-02-18 EditModes ==