Bureaucrats, interwiki, staff, Administrators
2,182
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
How about we make a page with "Good Examples" so that people get an idea of how to make a great article? --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 12:44, 19 Feb 2006 (EST) | How about we make a page with "Good Examples" so that people get an idea of how to make a great article? --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 12:44, 19 Feb 2006 (EST) | ||
== Proposal 2006-02-19 Wiki Engine Template== | |||
The basic article template "Wiki List" is being used for Engine category pages. Almost all engines have a wiki, for example, MoinMoin has MoinMoinWiki. In this case, there is a page for the wiki ([[MoinMoinWiki]]) as well as a page for the engine category ([[:category:MoinMoin]]). I believe this is correct. In the case of Lizzy, there is just a single page for both the wiki and the engine: ([[:category:Lizzy]]). This creates a recursive situation where the article points to itself. I'm not sure this is a big problem, but now would be a good time for us to establish consistent rules. | |||
: Checkout [[UseModWiki]]. Mark and I have been working on his idea that the page for an engine has the template box for the wiki for that engine '''and''' the list of wikis using that engine down below. I think we've learned a lot. [[Lizzy]] is part of our experiment. It's definitely time to get down to business documenting what we've learned and then decide how to proceed. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 15:57, 16 Feb 2006 (EST) | |||
I'm still a bit confused, but recommend that perhaps we make a WikiEngine template to try to solve the problem? --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 23:02, 19 Feb 2006 (EST) |