RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions
Removing comlpletely ludicrous information, and clarifying some
No edit summary |
(Removing comlpletely ludicrous information, and clarifying some) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Some members, have admitted to vandalising [[Conservapedia]] in the past. As most of the founding members were blocked from Conservapedia for trying to moderate anti-scientifc content and include more liberal points of view, they have continued to undermine Conservapedia in the following manners: | Some members, have admitted to vandalising [[Conservapedia]] in the past. As most of the founding members were blocked from Conservapedia for trying to moderate anti-scientifc content and include more liberal points of view, they have continued to undermine Conservapedia in the following manners: | ||
*Arguing | *Arguing (such as in the case of arguing that the Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University, Richard Dawkins, was, in fact, a professor); | ||
*Adding content that portrays Liberals as something other than Evil Incarnate; | *Adding content that portrays Liberals as something other than Evil Incarnate; | ||
*Blanking pages, including pages of admins; | *Blanking pages, including pages of admins; | ||
*Openly mocking the site owner and administrators of Conservapedia | *Openly mocking the site owner and administrators of Conservapedia | ||
*Trying to add scientific content to pages espousing only a young-Earth creationist POV | *Trying to add scientific content to pages espousing only a young-Earth creationist POV | ||
| Line 51: | Line 44: | ||
*Many of the users hold Fundamentalist Religion in contempt, they often criticize Christianity, conservativism, family values, pro-life, etc. | *Many of the users hold Fundamentalist Religion in contempt, they often criticize Christianity, conservativism, family values, pro-life, etc. | ||
*Many of the admins insult religion on their user pages | *Many of the admins insult religion on their user pages | ||
*Allegations of cyber-terrorism, posting of pornography and use of foul language have also been made by Andy's Acolytes,but no proof has been offered which links any of this specifically to senior editors at RationalWiki. The FBI has no comment. | *Allegations of cyber-terrorism, posting of pornography and use of foul language have also been made by Andy's Acolytes,but no proof has been offered which links any of this specifically to senior editors at RationalWiki. The FBI has no comment. | ||