RationalWiki (en): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
736 bytes removed ,  2 August 2008
Removing comlpletely ludicrous information, and clarifying some
No edit summary
(Removing comlpletely ludicrous information, and clarifying some)
Line 27: Line 27:
Some members, have admitted to vandalising [[Conservapedia]] in the past. As most of the founding members were blocked from Conservapedia for trying to moderate anti-scientifc content and include more liberal points of view, they have continued to undermine Conservapedia in the following manners:
Some members, have admitted to vandalising [[Conservapedia]] in the past. As most of the founding members were blocked from Conservapedia for trying to moderate anti-scientifc content and include more liberal points of view, they have continued to undermine Conservapedia in the following manners:


*Arguing;
*Arguing (such as in the case of arguing that the Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University, Richard Dawkins, was, in fact, a professor);
*Trying to remove content;
*Adding content that portrays Liberals as something other than Evil Incarnate;
*Adding content that portrays Liberals as something other than Evil Incarnate;
*Blanking pages, including pages of admins;
*Blanking pages, including pages of admins;
*Using foul language against other editors;
*Showing outright contempt for the site, conservatism in general, Christianity, and family values;
*The insertion of objectionable content, such as porn images and links to porn sites;
*Lying, by either including deliberately false article content, suggesting that Conservatives might not be divine beings of immaculate virtue who are always right, or lying in their own conduct;
*Vandalism and cyber-terrorist tactics.  Because making malicious edits to a webpage that can be reverted with a single click is the moral equivalent of car-bombing.
*Openly mocking the site owner and administrators of Conservapedia
*Openly mocking the site owner and administrators of Conservapedia
*Trying to add scientific content to pages espousing only a young-Earth creationist POV
*Trying to add scientific content to pages espousing only a young-Earth creationist POV
Line 51: Line 44:
*Many of the users hold Fundamentalist Religion in contempt, they often criticize Christianity, conservativism, family values, pro-life, etc.
*Many of the users hold Fundamentalist Religion in contempt, they often criticize Christianity, conservativism, family values, pro-life, etc.
*Many of the admins insult religion on their user pages
*Many of the admins insult religion on their user pages
*Many users at RationalWiki will remove factual material, even if backed up by sources, from articles, which are supposed to unoffically express a liberal point of views for example see http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Liberal&curid=935&diff=202920&oldid=202917
*Allegations of cyber-terrorism, posting of pornography and use of foul language have also been made by Andy's Acolytes,but no proof has been offered which links any of this specifically to senior editors at RationalWiki.  The FBI has no comment.
*Allegations of cyber-terrorism, posting of pornography and use of foul language have also been made by Andy's Acolytes,but no proof has been offered which links any of this specifically to senior editors at RationalWiki.  The FBI has no comment.


Anonymous user

Navigation menu