User talk:This is not the solution: Difference between revisions

Assume Good Faith
No edit summary
(Assume Good Faith)
Line 4: Line 4:
:First, I apologize for the vandalism. I will clean up everything on my own. The issue is that Proxima Centauri is abusing her powers and reverting and protecting any edits to [[RationalWiki]], [[Liberapedia]] and other articles. She claims that removing content is a blockable offense. If you look at her edits at RationalWiki, you'll see that's an absurd claim, for example, look at [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWiki&diff=69045&oldid=69043 this], which contains two wrong dates, unnecessary quoting of the linked blog post and comment (I've summarised the content instead, and linked to the post), and her speculation about when the site would come back and a sentence before that does state when the site will come back. Only getting the right date there was a struggle. But her main problem seems to be that I and others have removed a paragraph advertising Liberapedia.  Then there's [[Liberapedia]], which is her own wiki. I tried to improve her writing, but she reverted me without explanation and locked the article for a month. [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Liberapedia&diff=69117&oldid=69073]. [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki]] also contains a previous incident during which she abused her powers on [[RationalWiki]] to pursue a personal grudge. [[User:65.60.37.195|65.60.37.195]] 06:26, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
:First, I apologize for the vandalism. I will clean up everything on my own. The issue is that Proxima Centauri is abusing her powers and reverting and protecting any edits to [[RationalWiki]], [[Liberapedia]] and other articles. She claims that removing content is a blockable offense. If you look at her edits at RationalWiki, you'll see that's an absurd claim, for example, look at [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWiki&diff=69045&oldid=69043 this], which contains two wrong dates, unnecessary quoting of the linked blog post and comment (I've summarised the content instead, and linked to the post), and her speculation about when the site would come back and a sentence before that does state when the site will come back. Only getting the right date there was a struggle. But her main problem seems to be that I and others have removed a paragraph advertising Liberapedia.  Then there's [[Liberapedia]], which is her own wiki. I tried to improve her writing, but she reverted me without explanation and locked the article for a month. [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Liberapedia&diff=69117&oldid=69073]. [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki]] also contains a previous incident during which she abused her powers on [[RationalWiki]] to pursue a personal grudge. [[User:65.60.37.195|65.60.37.195]] 06:26, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
::I'll help with the vandalism, by the way. [[User:Phantom Hoover2|Phantom Hoover2]] 06:27, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
::I'll help with the vandalism, by the way. [[User:Phantom Hoover2|Phantom Hoover2]] 06:27, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
== Assume Good Faith ==
So - I am starting from this point.  I know we are in a mess and I am late - but that is were I would like to start.
[[User:Proxima Centauri]] has done a lot of work here and for that I am grateful.
Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,132

edits