User talk:This is not the solution: Difference between revisions

::Several users or several sockpuppets of the same user first insisted on getting the [[RationalWiki]] article their way if they could, then when I protected that article they started general vandalism.  I hope I've cleared it all up. As far as I know they're all blocked but the user or users are experts at ban evasion and range blocks may be needed if it restarts. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 06:19, 24 August 2009 (EDT)

:First, I apologize for the vandalism. I will clean up everything on my own. The issue is that Proxima Centauri is abusing her powers and reverting and protecting any edits to [[RationalWiki]], [[Liberapedia]] and other articles. She claims that removing content is a blockable offense. If you look at her edits at RationalWiki, you'll see that's an absurd claim, for example, look at [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=RationalWiki&diff=69045&oldid=69043 this], which contains two wrong dates, unnecessary quoting of the linked blog post and comment (I've summarised the content instead, and linked to the post), and her speculation about when the site would come back and a sentence before that does state when the site will come back. Only getting the right date there was a struggle. But her main problem seems to be that I and others have removed a paragraph advertising Liberapedia.  Then there's [[Liberapedia]], which is her own wiki. I tried to improve her writing, but she reverted me without explanation and locked the article for a month. [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=Liberapedia&diff=69117&oldid=69073]. [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki]] also contains a previous incident during which she abused her powers on [[RationalWiki]] to pursue a personal grudge. [[User:65.60.37.195|65.60.37.195]] 06:26, 24 August 2009 (EDT)