1,136
edits
User talk:Lumenos: Difference between revisions
→Reordering talk page comments
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:::::::::::Does "messing with" mean "moving"? If so, it seems there is no polite way to create a debate map if any editor strays from the stated topic. I wish I knew if anyone had a reason for this. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:39, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::::::::Does "messing with" mean "moving"? If so, it seems there is no polite way to create a debate map if any editor strays from the stated topic. I wish I knew if anyone had a reason for this. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:39, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::::::::Yes. You moved my comment were I was directly responding to the comment above, claiming I was off topic. That was not nice. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 08:42, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::::::::::Yes. You moved my comment were I was directly responding to the comment above, claiming I was off topic. That was not nice. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 08:42, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::::::'''Nooooow you tell me, you didn't appreciate that. Well I restored the one I think you are talking about. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:59, 1 September 2009 (EDT) ''' | |||
:::::::::::::Well what I would do, is just create a new section named after the argument you wish to make and copy everything relevant to that argument there. I know what you are referring to, and am not certain that it was off topic. I responded to your statement like you had just learned what the topic of the section was, but I don't know. That could be moved back. Don't feel too inhibited, especially if I am doing something unprecedented, to revert such changes if they are inappropriate, in your view. But umm I guess it doesn't bother you that you appeared to be arguing for something which you later stated that you did not care about. Well but then you had a different reason, I guess. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:55, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::::::::::Well what I would do, is just create a new section named after the argument you wish to make and copy everything relevant to that argument there. I know what you are referring to, and am not certain that it was off topic. I responded to your statement like you had just learned what the topic of the section was, but I don't know. That could be moved back. Don't feel too inhibited, especially if I am doing something unprecedented, to revert such changes if they are inappropriate, in your view. But umm I guess it doesn't bother you that you appeared to be arguing for something which you later stated that you did not care about. Well but then you had a different reason, I guess. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:55, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
(undent) I was responding to the previous comment. That it was off-topic in your opinion is irrelevant. It was very much on-topic IMHO because your argument was that RW was going to remove all criticism of CP, therefore WikiIndex should promote Liberapedia as and alternative. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 09:02, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | (undent) I was responding to the previous comment. That it was off-topic in your opinion is irrelevant. It was very much on-topic IMHO because your argument was that RW was going to remove all criticism of CP, therefore WikiIndex should promote Liberapedia as and alternative. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 09:02, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I thought ''you'' said you had just realized the topic and that you didn't care if there was a link to Liberapedia, but then you went into an argument apparently to say there shouldn't be, so I suppose I went with the answer I liked. Right after I moved it (we were both online at the same time, right?) you put a message in the previous location, when you could have just undid the edit. You don't seem to have much inhibition in reverting edits usually, so I thought we had consensus on that and I reorganized some other stuff. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:19, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | :I thought ''you'' said you had just realized the topic and that you didn't care if there was a link to Liberapedia, but then you went into an argument apparently to say there shouldn't be, so I suppose I went with the answer I liked. Right after I moved it (we were both online at the same time, right?) you put a message in the previous location, when you could have just undid the edit. You don't seem to have much inhibition in reverting edits usually, so I thought we had consensus on that and I reorganized some other stuff. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:19, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:'''I restored the one I think Nx was talking about. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 11:59, 1 September 2009 (EDT) ''' | |||
== Writing policies and facilitating consensus == | == Writing policies and facilitating consensus == | ||