1,136
edits
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
(undent) I was responding to the previous comment. That it was off-topic in your opinion is irrelevant. It was very much on-topic IMHO because your argument was that RW was going to remove all criticism of CP, therefore WikiIndex should promote Liberapedia as and alternative. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 09:02, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | (undent) I was responding to the previous comment. That it was off-topic in your opinion is irrelevant. It was very much on-topic IMHO because your argument was that RW was going to remove all criticism of CP, therefore WikiIndex should promote Liberapedia as and alternative. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 09:02, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I | :A little background here. I created a section that said at the top: "Please place or move arguments here for what makes a wiki notable and similar enough to RationalWiki, to be included in the "See also" section." within that there was another section that said at the top "(Please indent rebuttal's and place them under the argument in favor. Only bullet arguments favoring the inclusion of Liberpedia info. '''I'm moving editors posts and making this like an outline, if no one minds.'''" [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:36, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:'''I | :(Section got large) Nx came and started posting later I think, so he may have not noticed those messages ooooooor maybe he saw them and this was all part of his little plan. Just a possibility. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:36, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:After a great long debate in one of these sections Nx said: | |||
::Ok, I think I understand now, you're arguing for including a link to Liberapedia in this article. If that is so, I'm afraid your efforts to to defeat me in this debate have been in vain, because I have no problem with that (though your argument is a bit stretched because Liberapedia is a parody of CP, while RW refutes CP). But then again I'm not familiar with Liberapedia's content enough to make a judgement here. Nx 16:01, 31 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
:::''So I moved comments he had made before that to a section with a name that appeared more like uuh did I mention that he was going on about "snarkiness", and how fun it is. Oh yeah, topic headings could always be renamed, no problem. Then it was "lol" in the edit history description, you know, like as if to say, "yea for that edit!" or "more like that please!" Which was basically what he meant. Okay so I think it is all fairly clear now who was behind all this. All I'm saying is just be careful with this guy.'' [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:36, 1 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
== Writing policies and facilitating consensus == | == Writing policies and facilitating consensus == |
edits