User talk:MarkDilley: Difference between revisions

Mark Dilley wins another victory in the fight against unnecessary complexity
(Mark Dilley wins another victory in the fight against unnecessary complexity)
Line 1,386: Line 1,386:
:::::I moved the horribly confused "debate maps" to a subpage. I apologize for that, and not moving them sooner. Everything that is left of the sections I created, seems to be organized and relevant (although I'm sure others won't see it that way but they '''can''' edit the page, just like it is an article). [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:56, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
:::::I moved the horribly confused "debate maps" to a subpage. I apologize for that, and not moving them sooner. Everything that is left of the sections I created, seems to be organized and relevant (although I'm sure others won't see it that way but they '''can''' edit the page, just like it is an article). [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:56, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
::::::Actually, I don't want to get into a debate about that side of it. My point is that nobody reading the articles themselves or their talk pages will understand what is going on or how to resolve it.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 10:19, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
::::::Actually, I don't want to get into a debate about that side of it. My point is that nobody reading the articles themselves or their talk pages will understand what is going on or how to resolve it.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 10:19, 7 September 2009 (EDT)
== Mark Dilley wins another victory in the fight against unnecessary complexity ==
I guess I was expecting dozens of people to each insert their pet peeve into the
[[WikiIndex talk:Blocking Policy#draft blocking policy proposal]],
making it balloon up into a huge monster of complexity.
I am pleasantly surprised that you made it shorter.
Also, it makes me happy that you deleted my negative language about "warning" and replaced it with a more positive alternative.
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 01:44, 8 September 2009 (EDT)