1,316
edits
(Mark Dilley wins another victory in the fight against unnecessary complexity) |
|||
Line 1,386: | Line 1,386: | ||
:::::I moved the horribly confused "debate maps" to a subpage. I apologize for that, and not moving them sooner. Everything that is left of the sections I created, seems to be organized and relevant (although I'm sure others won't see it that way but they '''can''' edit the page, just like it is an article). [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:56, 7 September 2009 (EDT) | :::::I moved the horribly confused "debate maps" to a subpage. I apologize for that, and not moving them sooner. Everything that is left of the sections I created, seems to be organized and relevant (although I'm sure others won't see it that way but they '''can''' edit the page, just like it is an article). [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:56, 7 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::::::Actually, I don't want to get into a debate about that side of it. My point is that nobody reading the articles themselves or their talk pages will understand what is going on or how to resolve it.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 10:19, 7 September 2009 (EDT) | ::::::Actually, I don't want to get into a debate about that side of it. My point is that nobody reading the articles themselves or their talk pages will understand what is going on or how to resolve it.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 10:19, 7 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Mark Dilley wins another victory in the fight against unnecessary complexity == | |||
I guess I was expecting dozens of people to each insert their pet peeve into the | |||
[[WikiIndex talk:Blocking Policy#draft blocking policy proposal]], | |||
making it balloon up into a huge monster of complexity. | |||
I am pleasantly surprised that you made it shorter. | |||
Also, it makes me happy that you deleted my negative language about "warning" and replaced it with a more positive alternative. | |||
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 01:44, 8 September 2009 (EDT) |