Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions

reply to Huw the blind, and Tmtoulouse
(reply to Huw the blind, and Tmtoulouse)
Line 415: Line 415:


After having read this article I must say even I have learned interesting facts about RationalWiki, I particularly liked the in-depth tag coverage. Keep up the good work!. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 14:09, 8 September 2009 (EDT)
After having read this article I must say even I have learned interesting facts about RationalWiki, I particularly liked the in-depth tag coverage. Keep up the good work!. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 14:09, 8 September 2009 (EDT)
:What is tag coverage? [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 01:39, 10 September 2009 (EDT)


==  Huw Powel removed four similar wikis from the RationalWiki article ==
==  Huw Powel removed four similar wikis from the RationalWiki article ==
Line 422: Line 423:
[[User_talk:Huw_Powell#Removing_four_similar_wikis_from_the_RationalWiki_article|I have inquired as to how this is helping WikiIndex, on his talk page]]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:31, 9 September 2009 (EDT)
[[User_talk:Huw_Powell#Removing_four_similar_wikis_from_the_RationalWiki_article|I have inquired as to how this is helping WikiIndex, on his talk page]]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 12:31, 9 September 2009 (EDT)
:How were they "similar", apart from being wikis? An encyclopedia; RW is not.  A parody of a conservative encyclopedia, RW is not; what were the other two?  An atheism wiki?  RW is not. ??? [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 22:14, 9 September 2009 (EDT)
:How were they "similar", apart from being wikis? An encyclopedia; RW is not.  A parody of a conservative encyclopedia, RW is not; what were the other two?  An atheism wiki?  RW is not. ??? [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 22:14, 9 September 2009 (EDT)
::Do you have a brain tumor or is the cat walking on your keyboard? They have similar content, OBVIOUSLY. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 01:39, 10 September 2009 (EDT)


== Could it be |337 h@x0r5? ==
== Could it be |337 h@x0r5? ==
1,136

edits