1,136
edits
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:RationalWiki (en)/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 05:34, 10 September 2009
, 10 September 2009→Could it be |337 h@x0r5?
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 430: | Line 430: | ||
:Note the timing of the RationalWiki crash, when [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] was on vacation. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:22, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | :Note the timing of the RationalWiki crash, when [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] was on vacation. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 14:22, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::MySQL is one of the most used db systems on the web. Wikipedia uses it. Google uses it. Facebook uses it. I would argue that it's pretty stable if all these websites use it. And a mysql crash wouldn't take the entire server down. Trent said it was a hardware error, but he didn't provide details. I'll ignore your conspiracy theories and insinuations. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:15, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ::MySQL is one of the most used db systems on the web. Wikipedia uses it. Google uses it. Facebook uses it. I would argue that it's pretty stable if all these websites use it. And a mysql crash wouldn't take the entire server down. Trent said it was a hardware error, but he didn't provide details. I'll ignore your conspiracy theories and insinuations. [[User:Nx|Nx]] 15:15, 9 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Thanks for the info Nx. I'm going to ignore this conspiracy theory myself, it was obviously the work of lumetics. [[WikiIndex:Policies_and_Guidelines#Examples|We need to keep these people from being able to slip this information into WikiIndex]]. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 01:34, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | |||