1,317
edits
Category talk:New: Difference between revisions
I would like to keep New category
(What do you think we should do?) |
EarthFurst (talk | contribs) (I would like to keep New category) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:: Yes, all wiki start out that way. I suppose we ''could'' leave a wiki status as "New" indefinitely, until something happens. Until it would be more accurate to call it some other [[:Category:Wiki Status]] -- perhaps "Active" or "Spammed" or "Inactive" or "Dead". What do you think we should do? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 23:15, 24 October 2009 (EDT) | :: Yes, all wiki start out that way. I suppose we ''could'' leave a wiki status as "New" indefinitely, until something happens. Until it would be more accurate to call it some other [[:Category:Wiki Status]] -- perhaps "Active" or "Spammed" or "Inactive" or "Dead". What do you think we should do? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 23:15, 24 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
::: I'd like to keep New category. I think it is a reasonable way of letting people know of a wiki that relatively New and is thus probably a wiki they haven't looked at and probably needs more contributions. I was thinking of taking [[Apologetics Wiki]] and adding it to a birth category (perhaps 2009 March births?)[http://www.apologetics-wiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page&dir=prev&limit=7&action=history]. I think a wiki should lose New status when (a) after seven months (so Apologetics Wiki would lose its New status in November (1 month old in April, 2 months old in May, 3 in June, 4 in July, 5 in Aug, 6 in Sept and 7 in October) or (b) it gets big enough (more than 100 articles?) --[[User:EarthFurst|EarthFurst]] 01:58, 25 October 2009 (EDT) | |||