1,136
edits
User talk:MarkDilley: Difference between revisions
→Mark Dilley wins another victory in the fight against unnecessary complexity: Wikipedia's block policy is far better (as a guide for sysops)
(→"Archive" most of this page to subpage: I went ahead and archived the page...) |
(→Mark Dilley wins another victory in the fight against unnecessary complexity: Wikipedia's block policy is far better (as a guide for sysops)) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Also, it makes me happy that you deleted my negative language about "warning" and replaced it with a more positive alternative. | Also, it makes me happy that you deleted my negative language about "warning" and replaced it with a more positive alternative. | ||
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 01:44, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 01:44, 8 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I strongly believe that [http://www.wikiindex.org/index.php?title=WikiIndex_talk:Blocking_Policy&oldid=70223 DavidCary's original version], based on Wikipedia's block policy, was far clearer and better. Dilley's version sounds like it is mostly written to be "simple" for editors, but I think what you mainly need is a guide for sysops and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy Wikipedia's block policy] couldn't be simpler without loosing something important. The table of contents make it simple and easy to use as a reference when you have a situation or emergency. (I ramble on [[WikiIndex_talk:Blocking_Policy#Comparing_the_block_policy_proposals|in this location]].) [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 13:52, 23 June 2010 (EDT) | |||
== The lunatics have taken over the asylum. == | == The lunatics have taken over the asylum. == | ||