RationalWiki (en)

From WikiIndex
Revision as of 21:15, 31 July 2008 by PhilG (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 56139 by 92.23.39.38 (talk))
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[{{{URL}}} {{{logo}}}] [{{{URL}}} RationalWiki (en)]
[{{{recentchanges URL}}} Recent changes]
[No WikiNode]
[No About]
[No Mobile URL]
Founded by:
Status: [[:Category:{{{status}}}|{{{status}}}]]
Language: [[:Category:Wiki {{{language}}}|{{{language}}}]]
Edit mode: [[:Category:{{{editmode}}}|{{{editmode}}}]]
Wiki engine: [[:Category:{{{engine}}}|{{{engine}}}]]
Wiki license: [[:Category:Wiki {{{license}}}|{{{license}}}]]
Main topic: [[:Category:{{{maintopic}}}|{{{maintopic}}}]]

RationalWiki started in May 2007 responsing to Conservapedia. The content of the Wiki deals with Conservapedia a great deal but they also branched out into skepticism.

The site works to refute a range of faith based ideas and superstitions. They have material on Scientology, Astrology, New Age and many others.

Their stated goals are:

  • Analyzing and refuting the anti-science movement, ideas and people.
  • Analyzing and refuting the full range of crank ideas.
  • Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism.

Most of their traffic is to do with the page What is going on at Conservapedia? The website has a highly controversial sense of humour.
Example of RationalWiki’s perspective:-

As a site we have a point of view, and that point of view is that the scientific method and the information gained from its application is better than almost anything else humanity has come up with. We believe that the support of, profiting from and creation of pseudosciences is dangerous and wrong. [1]

Criticism

Many of the members, especially admins admit to having been vandals at many different wikis including Conservapedia. They have attacked Conservapedia in the following manners

  • Fighting and picking fights;
  • Trying to remove content;
  • Blanking pages, including pages of admins;
  • Using foul language against other editors;
  • Showing outright contempt for the site, conservatism in general, Christianity, and family values;
  • The insertion of objectionable content, such as porn images and links to porn sites;
  • Lying, by either including deliberately false article content, or lying in their own conduct;
  • Vandalism and cyber-terrorist tactics.
  • Many of the users hold Religion in contempt, they often criticize Christianity, conservativism, family values, pro-life, etc.

See also


Wiki size: unknown size

further tags: