Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, staff, Administrators
9,160
edits
Talk:TourBusStop: Difference between revisions
AAAAAAAAHH!!!!!!!!
(we're producing a reference material) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (AAAAAAAAHH!!!!!!!!) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:''Sure the paragraphy could go on the front page somewhere, or it could stay at the top of the discussion page. I like it either place. Sorry to either a) missed what you wrote elsewhere or b) have forgotten it or c) didn't understand it as such. Here are my thoughts: I think that those pages should operate like they do on other wiki. Those concepts can be talked about in a different section on the page or on the discussion page or linked back to the original idea for the concepts in Wikilandia, similar to what WikiNode and TourBusStop have "built-in". [[MarkDilley]] | :''Sure the paragraphy could go on the front page somewhere, or it could stay at the top of the discussion page. I like it either place. Sorry to either a) missed what you wrote elsewhere or b) have forgotten it or c) didn't understand it as such. Here are my thoughts: I think that those pages should operate like they do on other wiki. Those concepts can be talked about in a different section on the page or on the discussion page or linked back to the original idea for the concepts in Wikilandia, similar to what WikiNode and TourBusStop have "built-in". [[MarkDilley]] | ||
This now doesn't match how other media-wiki wikis work. I really think the fact that we're producing a reference material is important, and means mediawiki was a good choice. The main article space, for me, is just the pages that would be printed in a book, were we to print out our reference material. Our wiki-node wouldn't fit in a printed reference material, but the wiki-nodes-network would fit very well. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:44, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | This now doesn't match how other media-wiki wikis work. I really think the fact that we're producing a reference material is important, and means mediawiki was a good choice. The main article space, for me, is just the pages that would be printed in a book, were we to print out our reference material. Our wiki-node wouldn't fit in a printed reference material, but the wiki-nodes-network would fit very well. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:44, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | ||
:"We are producing a reference material" -- AHHHHHHH!!! This is a terrifying thought. As expressed in the Free links v CamelCase discussion I prefer an attitude of both. Meaning, just because we are a MediaWiki Wiki, doesn't mean we have to be like Wikipedia, nor does it in my mind mean that we have to be like other MediaWiki. We are a wiki... the WikiWay... [[MarkDilley]] | |||
Anything going to be added to this? —[[Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">User:Sean Fennel</span>]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">@</span>]] 16:12, 1 Apr 2006 (EST) | Anything going to be added to this? —[[Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">User:Sean Fennel</span>]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">@</span>]] 16:12, 1 Apr 2006 (EST) | ||