Category talk:Vibrant: Difference between revisions

: [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22If+you+want+do+delete+your+site+from+our+spam+bases+-+just+email+us+with+domain+of+your+site%22 google] knowns a lot of that --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 16:29, 6 October 2007 (EDT)

I'd like to see a much clearer and tighter definition to this [[Special:Categories|category]].  OK, on the [[:Category:Vibrant]] page, it gives four 'definitions', two of which are purely subjective and down to the individual editors best judgement – and I'm perfectly happy with those.  However, the other two are ripe for giving a much stricter definition, namely<br>

*'''''has significant content''''' — I would like to see a specific number for this (as it stands, that existing statement is very 'wooly' and open to a wide scope of interpretation).  I propose that this should mean the wiki site has 5,000 pages or more (yes, I know that there is probably already a category for that – but ''this'' 'Vibrant' category is looking accross four differing requirements!)<br>

*'''''has a high volume of traffic''''' — again another wooly statement.  I would like to see this changed to something like '''''has a high volume of constructive editing''''' – so say, more than 50 edits per 24 hours (and these edits should be soley constructive, and <u>not</u> include reverts, edit wars, nor spam deletion).  As it currently stands, 'traffic' could feasably mean 'number of page views', and I don't see how this can accurately be assessed with a snapshot from current [[wiki engine]] software stats, hence the need to change it to 'editing'.<br>

Discuss please . . . regards, [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 04:16, 28 September 2011 (PDT)