Category talk:All: Difference between revisions

549 bytes added ,  21 November 2012
Line 12: Line 12:
:Fundamentally, though, this Category:All should not include any dead wikis (be they classified as 'dead' or 'inactive').  [[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 09:24, 20 November 2012 (PST)
:Fundamentally, though, this Category:All should not include any dead wikis (be they classified as 'dead' or 'inactive').  [[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 09:24, 20 November 2012 (PST)
::Those Wikia wikis would be "dormant", would they not? Maybe a wiki that has been dormant for some time (e.g. a year) could be described as "inactive", but it would require a change in how inactive is defined here. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 04:22, 21 November 2012 (PST)
::Those Wikia wikis would be "dormant", would they not? Maybe a wiki that has been dormant for some time (e.g. a year) could be described as "inactive", but it would require a change in how inactive is defined here. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 04:22, 21 November 2012 (PST)
:::Yes, you are correct re the Wikia wikis :)
:::The confusion or lack of clarity over three current status definitions; inactive, dormant and dead.  IMVHO, inactive and dormant could/should be merged, as they have similar dictionary definitions (when applied to wikis), and dead should be used for ALL wikis which are gone for good.  [[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 06:06, 21 November 2012 (PST)